Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case legislation at both the federal and state levels.

How much sway case regulation holds may perhaps differ by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of your current case. To check out this concept, think about the following case legislation definition.

14. While in the light of your position explained higher than, it is concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be deemed for no fault of his individual and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there could possibly be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

To the foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year old boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.

Because of this, merely citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling an individual to tell them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-these types of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving across the neighborhood trying to find their phone is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s value.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a nicely-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.

Are you looking for Court Information? You can utilize our site to search for your case or search for the person. Information to the site is updated every 24 hrs at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found around the search site is provided to be used as reference material and is not the official court record.

The Cornell Legislation School website offers a range of information on legal topics, together with citation of case law, and also delivers a video tutorial on case citation.

Problems or Errors In case you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a lousy link or even a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService Center.

Given that the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has innocent misrepresentation case law already ruled on this. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.